The tirade from the Left is an unending parade of unsubstantiated slanders and hyperboles never subjected by the reporting media to any critical analysis. The most recent example of the long form version of such screed comes from freshman Senator Elizabeth Warren. I do have some things to say to the Senator. First, though, here's a link to her blog/open letter:
She's had herself quite the stem winder. While she calms down, takes a breath, and dispels her vapors, I think the answer to her objections is straightforward:
An Open Reply from Jim Henderson
Really?
Anarchist tirades? There are tirades going on, but they aren’t from
your boogey men “Extremist Republicans.” They are from your Democratic
Party. Examples:
Pres.
Obama: “Speaker John Boehner won’t even let the bill get a yes-or-no
vote because he doesn’t want to anger the extremists in his party.”
Pres.
Obama: “One faction of one party in one house of Congress in one
branch of government shut down major parts of the government, all
because they didn't like one law.”
Pres.
Obama: “One party to this conversation says that the only way that
they come to the table is if they get 100 percent of what they want, and
if they don't, they threaten to burn down the house.”
Pres. Obama: Republicans are“reckless and irresponsible”
Sen. Reid: Republicans are “anarchists”
Rep. Pelosi: Republicans are “legislative arsonists.”
Sen.
Mikulski vulgarly suggests that Ted Cruz appeases people who bounce
their testicles in others' mouths while they are drunk or sleeping:
“The reason Ted Cruz ... asked for a delay was so that he could have a
vote during today where ... the teabaggers in his tea party were going
to watch.”
Dan
Pfeiffer has Republicans as suicide bombers, “What we’re not for is
negotiating with people with a bomb strapped to their chest. We’re not
going to do that.”
Dear Elizabeth,
Your reliance on name calling is a strategy of minimization, rather than civil and
candid conversation. Why would anyone think you are a serious
counterpart in the Congress?
Please
be honest. Obama ordered the Executive Branch to make sequestration as
painful as possible. At DHS and TSA, equated with furloughing TSA
screeners. Furloughing wasn't required by the sequestration; it was just
preferred BY OBAMA and YOUR PARTY.
You
provide no basis on which to conclude that the problems are imaginary.
I suppose if you ignore the THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS of employees pushed
off of employer plans and pushed into part time status ALL THE
CONSEQUENCE OF OBAMACARE then things known factually to be so really are
just imaginary boogeymen.
“Fair and transparent?” Really? Did you want to go here during a shutdown that is a sequal to the Affordable Care Act?
Among
the disproportionalities of this Administration’s effectuation of the
Act is the illegal one year suspension of the employer mandate, and the
missing of 17 statutory deadlines for administrative actions under the
Act, the granting of waivers and dispensations to corporations, to
unions, to the President and his officers, to the Courts, to the
Congress.
Your
leap in logic, and your ahistorical assertion astound. Power grids
were not, for the most part, built by the FEDERAL government. Instead
power grids arose as a patchwork embodying a variety of private, public,
partnered, and joint ventures. The national railway system, a marvel
in its time was certainly not a product of government production.
Schools were never the product of FEDERAL government.
These
facetious points do not JUSTIFY government. They do explain it.
Simple civil liability would as easily train industry (and, in fact, has
trained industry) in the importance of safety, efficacy, design
adequacy and the like. Government’s role as a pre-screener of invention
and design is certainly DOABLE, but not INDISPENSABLE.
Elizabeth,
you know the Democratic Party’s mantra, when it comes to abortion is,
“I got mine, now you get yours.” There is no single more selfish act of
an individual than to kill another human being so to be able to live a
lifestyle otherwise frustrated by the threatened life.
I
think Bill Clinton would prefer that you had left “toxic mortgages” out
of this discussion. After all, it was his administration and House and Senate Democrats
that pushed for the risky LIBOR mortgage structures designed to tease
the very edges of the economic community into home ownership.
Your
understanding of our History is poor, or poorly expressed. That
government governs best which governs least is not a Tea Party mantra,
but a Founders’ mantra.